🆚 Google Scholar vs. ORCID
- 📈 Google Scholar is three times more popular than ORCID.
- 🌎 Google Scholar is more popular in the United States, Indonesia, and Germany.
- 🌍 ORCID is more popular in Russia, Korea, and the Czech Republic.
Google Scholar
ORCIDType
About
Google Scholar is a free academic search engine that indexes peer-reviewed papers, theses, books, abstracts, and court cases from academic publishers, professional societies, online repositories, and universities.
It provides citation tracking through its "Cited by" feature, public author profiles, access to subscription articles through institutional libraries, email alerts, a case law database, and AI-generated outlines in the PDF reader.
ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) is an open, non-proprietary registry that provides unique persistent identifiers for researchers and scholars, enabling them to distinguish their identity and connect their work across systems.
It assigns a 16-digit ORCID iD to each user, allows individuals to manage a personal record with publications, affiliations, and funding, and offers a public API and registry search for interoperability across research platforms.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Science And Research category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Indonesia in the Science And Research category.
- 🥇 Most popular in India in the Science And Research category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Vietnam in the Science And Research category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Science And Research category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Germany in the Science And Research category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.