🆚 govAccess vs. Yardi
- 📈 Yardi is as popular as govAccess.
- 🌍 Yardi is more popular in Canada.
- 🌎 govAccess is more popular in the United States.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Content management system
About
Granicus govAccess is a content management system purposely built for government websites.
Yardi Systems provides a lineup of property management software that includes Yardi Breeze, Yardi Voyager, and RentCafe.
It positions Breeze for smaller operators with a simplified cloud option, Voyager for enterprise-scale portfolios with full accounting and operations, and RentCafe for marketing, leasing, and resident service portals integrated with the core platforms.
Headquarters
Denver, Colorado, United States
Santa Barbara, California, United States
Pricing
Free version ❌
Breeze$1,200+/year
Breeze Premier$4,800+/year
Voyager$14,400+/year
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Yardi CMS is as popular as govAccess.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Yardi is more popular in Canada, while govAccess is more popular in the United States.
United States
Canada
United Arab Emirates
Awards
- ⬆️ 70th most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 73rd most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Yardi is more popular among sites focused on real estate, while govAccess is more commonly used on public information, government and military, and non-profit, advocacy and NGO sites.
Real Estate
Public Information
Government/Military
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Marketing/Merchandising
Business
Travel
Portal Sites
Sports
Finance/Banking
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.