🆚 Hatena Bookmark vs. Pixiv
- 📈 Pixiv is noticeably more popular than Hatena Bookmark.
- 🌎 Pixiv is more popular in Japan, the United States, and the Netherlands.
- 🌍 Hatena Bookmark is more popular in the United Kingdom and South Africa.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Hatena BookmarkType
Social media platform
Social media platform
About
Hatena Bookmark is the most popular social bookmarking service in Japan.
Pixiv is a Japanese online community for artists.
Headquarters
Kyoto, Japan
Tokyo, Japan
Pricing
Free ✔️
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Pixiv social media platform is 1.4 times more popular than Hatena Bookmark.
Total websites
Market share
Social Media
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Pixiv is more popular in Japan, the United States, and the Netherlands, while Hatena Bookmark is more popular in the United Kingdom and South Africa.
Japan
Vietnam
United States
United Kingdom
South Africa
Netherlands
Canada
China
India
Taiwan
Awards
- 🔥 17th most popular in Japan in the Social Media category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Design Portfolios category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in the United States in the Design Portfolios category.
- 🔥 15th most popular in Japan in the Social Media category.
- ⬆️ 63rd most popular in the United States in the Social Media category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Pixiv is more popular among sites focused on entertainment, art, culture and heritage, and media downloads, while Hatena Bookmark is more commonly used on blogs and wiki, business, and portal sites sites.
Blogs/Wiki
Entertainment
Business
Portal Sites
Art/Culture/Heritage
Marketing/Merchandising
Sports
Search Engines
Media Downloads
Pornography
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Facebook
Instagram
X
Line
Mixi
Behance🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.