🆚 Headless UI vs. Polymer
- 📈 Polymer is five times more popular than Headless UI.
- 🌎 Polymer is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
- 🌍 Headless UI is more popular in China, Russia, and Slovakia.
Headless UI
PolymerType
About
Headless UI is an open-source library of unstyled, fully accessible UI components designed for 
React and 
Vue applications, with close integration with 
Tailwind CSS.
It provides interactive components such as dialogs, menus, listboxes, comboboxes, tabs, switches, and popovers, implements keyboard navigation and 
ARIA accessibility patterns, and supplies only the behavior and accessibility logic so developers can apply any design system, 
CSS framework, or custom styling.
Polymer is a legacy open-source 
JavaScript library created by Google for building components based on Web Components standards.
The library introduced declarative custom elements, data binding, shadow DOM helpers, and reusable component packaging, and later evolved into the 
Lit project focused on lightweight and faster component development.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Sweden in the Components category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Indonesia in the Components category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Sweden in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Belgium in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in the United States in the Components category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Canada in the Components category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Australia in the Components category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Switzerland in the Components category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Israel in the Components category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Belgium in the Components category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Google company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,655,631 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.