🆚 Hexo vs. Pelican
- 📈 Hexo is five times more popular than Pelican.
- 🌎 Hexo is more popular in China, the United States, and Italy.
- 🌍 Pelican is more popular in Germany and France.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Static site generator
Static site generator
About
Hexo is a 
Node.js-powered static site generator.
Pelican is a Python-powered static site generator powered that requires no database or server-side logic.
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Static Site Generators › Rank #9
Static Site Generators › Rank #20
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Hexo static site generator is 5 times more popular than Pelican.
Total websites
Market share
Static Site Generators
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Hexo is more popular in China, the United States, and Italy, while Pelican is more popular in Germany and France.
China
United States
Germany
Italy
Japan
United Kingdom
Netherlands
Taiwan
Russia
Turkey
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in China in the Static Site Generators category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in the United States in the Static Site Generators category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Hexo is more popular than Pelican in all market segments.
Blogs/Wiki
Business
Software/Hardware
Technical/Business Forums
Technical Information
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Travel
Personal Pages
Marketing/Merchandising
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
VitePress
Gridsome
Astro
Hugo
MkDocs
Quarto🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.