🆚 MkDocs vs. Pelican
- 📈 MkDocs is twice as popular as Pelican.
- 🌎 MkDocs is more popular in the United States, Germany, and France.
- 🌍 Pelican is more popular in Japan, Italy, and Taiwan.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Static site generator
Static site generator
About
MkDocs is an open-source static site generator for building project documentation from Markdown files with a simple configuration-driven workflow.
It uses a single YAML configuration file to define navigation and site settings, includes a built-in development server with live reloading, supports theming and plugins, and provides one-command deployment to
GitHub Pages.
Headquarters
Brighton, United Kingdom
United States
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
Static Site Generators › Rank #7
Static Site Generators › Rank #15
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The MkDocs static site generator is 2.4 times more popular than Pelican.
Total websites
Market share
Static Site Generators
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
MkDocs is more popular in the United States, Germany, and France, while Pelican is more popular in Japan, Italy, and Taiwan.
United States
Germany
France
Netherlands
United Kingdom
China
Switzerland
Canada
Russia
Japan
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
MkDocs is more popular among sites focused on software and hardware, Internet services, and technical information, while Pelican is more commonly used on blogs and wiki, technical, business forums, and marketing and merchandising sites.
Blogs/Wiki
Software/Hardware
Technical/Business Forums
Internet Services
Technical Information
Business
Education/Reference
Personal Pages
Sports
Marketing/Merchandising
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
