🆚 Honeybadger vs. Sentry
- 📈 Sentry is much more popular than Honeybadger.
- 🌍 Sentry is more popular in all countries.
Type
About
Honeybadger is a full-stack application monitoring and error tracking platform that helps developers detect, analyze, and resolve issues in web applications.
It provides real-time error alerts with stack traces and contextual data, intelligent error grouping to reduce noise, structured log management with searchable queries, application performance monitoring dashboards, uptime checks from multiple locations, cron job monitoring, and automatically updated public status pages.
Sentry is an open-source, developer-first error tracking and performance monitoring platform that helps identify, debug, and resolve issues across web, mobile, and backend applications.
It captures errors with full context including stack traces, user actions, and environment data, groups similar issues automatically to reduce noise, and links errors to specific releases and commits for faster root cause analysis.
Headquarters
Pricing
(50K errors)$26+/month
(50K errors, unlimited teams)$8+/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🔥 19th most popular in the United States in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the Netherlands in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the Application Monitoring category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,406,701 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.

TrackJS