🆚 Honeybadger vs. TrackJS
- 📈 TrackJS is four times more popular than Honeybadger.
- 🌍 TrackJS is more popular in the United Kingdom, Germany, and Australia.
- 🌎 Honeybadger is more popular in the United States and Canada.
Honeybadger
TrackJSType
About
Honeybadger is a full-stack application monitoring and error tracking platform that helps developers detect, analyze, and resolve issues in web applications.
It provides real-time error alerts with stack traces and contextual data, intelligent error grouping to reduce noise, structured log management with searchable queries, application performance monitoring dashboards, uptime checks from multiple locations, cron job monitoring, and automatically updated public status pages.
TrackJS is a frontend-focused error monitoring platform that captures 
JavaScript errors and runtime issues directly from users' browsers.
It uses a lightweight Browser Agent script to automatically record errors such as exceptions, failed network requests, and console messages, and provides detailed telemetry including user actions, network activity, and logs leading up to each error.
Headquarters
Pricing
(50K errors)$26+/month
(50K errors, unlimited teams)$8+/month
(100K page views)$49/month
(1M page views)$99/month
(5M+ page views)$199+/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🔥 19th most popular in the United States in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🔥 13rd most popular in Germany in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Application Monitoring category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in Australia in the Application Monitoring category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Sentry
Bugsnag
Rollbar🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.