🆚 HubSpot CMS vs. Open Journal Systems
- 📈 HubSpot CMS is five times more popular than Open Journal Systems.
- 🌎 HubSpot CMS is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
- 🌎 Open Journal Systems is more popular in Indonesia, Brazil, and India.
Open Journal SystemsType
About
HubSpot CMS is a hosted platform for building websites, blogs, landing pages, apps, and emails that integrates tightly with 
HubSpot CRM and other marketing tools.
It includes a theme library, a drag-and-drop editor, built-in SEO recommendations, content personalization based on CRM data, and over 2,000 marketplace integrations.
Open Journal Systems is an open-source software for managing and publishing peer-reviewed academic journals.
It provides a complete publishing workflow with role-based editorial management, customizable journal websites, section-based submissions, double-blind and open peer review options, and 
ORCID integration.
Headquarters
Pricing
(3 seats) $500/month
(5 seats) $1,500/month
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Finland in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Mexico in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in the United Kingdom in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Australia in the CMS category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Indonesia in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in India in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Brazil in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Ukraine in the CMS category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Canada in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
WordPress
Joomla
Drupal
Bitrix
Modern Campus
Terminalfour
Cascade CMS🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,603,958 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.