🆚 Hugo vs. Jekyll
Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *- 📈 Hugo is twice as popular as Jekyll.
- 🌎 Hugo is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Jekyll is more popular in Korea, Colombia, and Nepal.
HugoType
About
Hugo is a static site generator written in Go that focuses on speed, flexibility and structured content organization.
It supports Markdown content, templating, configurable taxonomies, multilingual sites, image processing, Sass and JavaScript pipelines, pretty URLs, a live-reload development server, and shortcodes to insert elements such as videos, images and social media embeds.
Jekyll is a static site generator written in Ruby.
It uses the Liquid templating language, supports front-matter metadata and data files in YAML, JSON, and CSV formats, includes a plugin system with custom converters and generators, and offers incremental regeneration to speed up build times.
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the Static Site Generators category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the Static Site Generators category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Canada in the Static Site Generators category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the Netherlands in the Static Site Generators category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Switzerland in the Static Site Generators category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in the United States in the Static Site Generators category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Static Site Generators category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Germany in the Static Site Generators category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in France in the Static Site Generators category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Brazil in the Static Site Generators category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Docusaurus
VitePress
Quarto* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.