🆚 Hypernova vs. Koa
- 📈 Hypernova is five times more popular than Koa.
- 🌎 Hypernova is more popular in Poland, Portugal, and the United States.
- 🌍 Koa is more popular in China.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Backend framework
Backend framework
About
Hypernova is a legacy open source service from Airbnb that renders
JavaScript views on the server to deliver
HTML for better page load and search engine indexing.
Koa is an expressive HTTP middleware framework for Node.js using ES2017 async functions.
Designed by the team behind Express, it offers a modular architecture, allowing developers to compose middleware functions for routing, error handling, and context management, providing fine-grained control over the request-response cycle.
Headquarters
San Francisco, California, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Hypernova backend framework is 5 times more popular than Koa.
Total websites
Market share
Backend Frameworks
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Hypernova is more popular in Poland, Portugal, and the United States, while Koa is more popular in China.
Poland
Portugal
United States
United Kingdom
Belgium
Netherlands
Sweden
Czech Republic
Japan
Slovakia
Awards
- 🔥 14th most popular in Poland in the Backend Frameworks category.
- 🔥 15th most popular in Portugal in the Backend Frameworks category.
- ⬆️ 22nd most popular in Poland in the Legacy category.
- ⬆️ 27th most popular in Portugal in the Legacy category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Hypernova is more popular among sites focused on public information, online shopping, and restaurants, while Koa is more commonly used on marketing and merchandising, business, and health sites.
Public Information
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Restaurants
Business
Fashion/Beauty
Health
Travel
Sports
Recreation/Hobbies
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.