🆚 IBM Cloud Object Storage vs. Tencent Cloud Object Storage
- 📈 Tencent Cloud Object Storage is much more popular than IBM Cloud Object Storage.
- 🌎 Tencent Cloud Object Storage is more popular in China, the United States, and Hong Kong.
- 🌎 IBM Cloud Object Storage is more popular in Brazil, Italy, and Canada.
Statistics based on 3.6M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Cloud storage service
Cloud storage service
About
Highly available, durable, and secure cloud storage with partial S3 API support.
Tencent Cloud Object Storage (COS) is a distributed storage service with Amazon S3-compatible APIs.
Headquarters
Armonk, New York, United States
Shenzhen, China
Pricing
Free tier ✔️ 5GB of free storage for 12 months
Categories
Cloud Storages › Rank #20
Cloud Storages › Rank #11
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Tencent Cloud Object Storage service is 11 times more popular than IBM Cloud Object Storage.
Total websites
Market share
Cloud Storages
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Tencent Cloud Object Storage is more popular in China, the United States, and Hong Kong, while IBM Cloud Object Storage is more popular in Brazil, Italy, and Canada.
China
United States
Hong Kong
Singapore
Brazil
Japan
Italy
Spain
Canada
Korea
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Tencent Cloud Object Storage is more popular among sites focused on business, education and reference, and Internet services, while IBM Cloud Object Storage is more commonly used on online shopping and finance and banking sites.
Business
Education/Reference
Internet Services
General News
Marketing/Merchandising
Software/Hardware
Blogs/Wiki
Online Shopping
Games
Motor Vehicles
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,603,958 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.