🆚 iCIMS vs. Pandapé
- 📈 iCIMS is three times more popular than Pandapé.
- 🌎 iCIMS is more popular in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌎 Pandapé is more popular in Brazil, Mexico, and Colombia.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
HR management software
HR management software
About
iCIMS is a cloud-based applicant tracking system with AI-powered automation and talent acquisition features.
It includes AI-driven candidate-to-job matching, automated candidate ranking, a chatbot for career sites and job search, job description optimization, and SEO and translation tools.
Pandapé is a cloud-based HR management platform popular in Latin America, featuring an applicant tracking system (ATS) directly integrated with Computrabajo.
Headquarters
Holmdel, New Jersey, United States
Mexico City, Mexico
Pricing
Free version ❌
$9,000+/year
Free version ❌
Custom
Categories
HR Management › Rank #9
HR Management › Rank #20
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The iCIMS HR management software is 3 times more popular than Pandapé.
Total websites
Market share
HR Management
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
iCIMS is more popular in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, while Pandapé is more popular in Brazil, Mexico, and Colombia.
United States
Brazil
Mexico
Canada
United Kingdom
Colombia
Argentina
Chile
Peru
United Arab Emirates
Awards
- ⭐ 5th most popular in the United States in the HR Management category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Brazil in the HR Management category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
iCIMS is more popular among sites focused on business, marketing and merchandising, and health, while Pandapé is more commonly used on recreation and hobbies, and motor vehicles sites.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Health
Online Shopping
Finance/Banking
Education/Reference
Entertainment
Real Estate
Travel
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,816,780 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.

