🆚 Indexhibit vs. Kirby
- 📈 Indexhibit is much more popular than Kirby.
- 🌍 Indexhibit is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Content management system
About
Indexhibit is an open-source CMS that is primarily used to create online portfolios.
Kirby is a commercial flat-file content management system that lets users build websites using plain text files for content without requiring a database.
It supports Markdown for text formatting,
YAML-based blueprints to define structured fields and content models, multilingual sites, customizable user roles and permissions, and built-in image manipulation and media management.
Headquarters
Neckargemünd, Germany
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free version ✔️Free upon request for students, selected educational projects, charities and nonprofits
Basic€99
Enterprise€349
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Indexhibit CMS is 7 times more popular than Kirby.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Indexhibit is more popular than Kirby in all countries.
United States
Germany
Spain
France
Switzerland
United Kingdom
Czech Republic
Netherlands
Belgium
Italy
Awards
- ⬆️ 26th most popular in Spain in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 65th most popular in Germany in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 86th most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Indexhibit is more popular among sites focused on art, culture and heritage, marketing and merchandising, and entertainment, while Kirby is more commonly used on business sites.
Art/Culture/Heritage
Marketing/Merchandising
Entertainment
Business
Education/Reference
Blogs/Wiki
Sports
Public Information
Travel
Fashion/Beauty
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Pico