🆚 Ionicons vs. Material Icons

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Icon library
Icon library

About

Ionicons is an open-source icon set with 1,300 icons built for Ionic Framework, so icons have both Material Design and iOS versions.

Material Icons is an official icon library created by Google that provides standardized interface icons designed according to the Material Design guidelines.

The set includes thousands of icons across categories such as navigation, communication, media, and editing, and is available in SVG, PNG, and icon font formats, with variants such as filled, outlined, rounded, sharp, and two-tone styles.

Headquarters

Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Mountain View, California, United States

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

Icons › Rank #2
Icons › Rank #7

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Ionicons library is 3 times more popular than Material Icons.
Total websites

Market share

Icons

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Ionicons is more popular in the United States, Thailand, and Italy, while Material Icons is more popular in Japan, Israel, and Kyrgyzstan.
United States
Thailand
Italy
Japan
Germany
United Kingdom
Spain
India
France
China

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Ionicons is more popular than Material Icons in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Blogs/Wiki
Internet Services
Travel
Entertainment
Health
Sports

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
javmost.com
#4,058
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#1,111
#1,154
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.