🆚 Isotope vs. Swiper
- 📈 Swiper is four times more popular than Isotope.
- 🌎 Swiper is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Isotope is more popular in Swaziland, Guinea-Bissau, and British Indian Ocean Territory.
SwiperType
About
Isotope is a commercial 
JavaScript library for creating filterable and sortable grid layouts.
Swiper is a modern touch slider library for building responsive sliders and carousels with hardware-accelerated transitions.
It offers touch and swipe navigation optimized for mobile, native-like momentum and resistance effects, support for vertical and horizontal modes, a modular plugin system with pagination, navigation, thumbnails, and parallax, accessibility features, and integrations with popular frameworks such as 
React, 
Vue, and 
Angular.
Headquarters
Pricing
(1 developer)$25
(up to 8 developers)$110
(unlimited developers)$320
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Iraq in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Lebanon in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Cameroon in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Fiji in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Jamaica in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in China in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Spain in the Sliders category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Tether
Slick
Owl Carousel
Tiny Slider🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,431,368 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.