🆚 Jekyll vs. ReadMe
- 📈 Jekyll is much more popular than ReadMe.
- 🌍 Jekyll is more popular in all countries.
JekyllType
About
Jekyll is a static site generator written in Ruby.
It uses the Liquid templating language, supports front-matter metadata and data files in 
YAML, 
JSON, and CSV formats, includes a plugin system with custom converters and generators, and offers incremental regeneration to speed up build times.
ReadMe is a cloud-based documentation platform that helps teams create, publish, and manage interactive API documentation hubs.
It provides a WYSIWYG and MDX (
Markdown eXtended) editor with versioning and 
Git sync, interactive API references where developers can test endpoints and see live responses, built-in AI tools for writing and linting, customizable components and themes, and changelogs and guides.
Headquarters
Pricing
(an AI assistant)$150
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in the United States in the Static Site Generators category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Static Site Generators category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Germany in the Static Site Generators category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in France in the Static Site Generators category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Brazil in the Static Site Generators category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in the United States in the Static Site Generators category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Docusaurus
MkDocs
VitePress
Quarto
GitBook
Slate
Doxygen🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.