🆚 Jekyll vs. VitePress

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Static site generator
Static site generator

About

Jekyll is a static site generator written in Ruby.

It uses the Liquid templating language, supports front-matter metadata and data files in YAML, JSON, and CSV formats, includes a plugin system with custom converters and generators, and offers incremental regeneration to speed up build times.

VitePress is a Vue-powered static site generator and successor to VuePress, built on top of the Vite build tool.

It provides a Markdown-first workflow with Vue components, fast development updates through Vite's module system, automatic routing and sidebar generation, support for TypeScript and JSX in Markdown, built-in search indexing, a theming system, and static HTML output with minimal client-side JavaScript.

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Jekyll static site generator is 11 times more popular than VitePress.
Total websites

Market share

Static Site Generators

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Jekyll is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany, while VitePress is more popular in China.
United States
United Kingdom
Germany
China
France
Brazil
Netherlands
Italy
Canada
India

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Jekyll is more popular than VitePress in all market segments.
Blogs/Wiki
Software/Hardware
Internet Services
Technical/Business Forums
Business
Education/Reference
Technical Information
Games
Marketing/Merchandising
Personal Pages

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#3,491
#10,456
#12,723
#15,399
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#6,061
#29,061
#29,726
#42,883
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.