🆚 jQuery Cookie vs. Namo WebEditor
- 📈 jQuery Cookie is much more popular than Namo WebEditor.
- 🌍 jQuery Cookie is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Namo WebEditor is particularly popular in Korea.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
jQuery Cookie
Namo WebEditorType
JavaScript library
HTML editor
About
A deprecated 
jQuery plugin for reading, writing and deleting cookies.
Namo WebEditor is a legacy WYSIWYG 
HTML editor that was discontinued in 2011.
Headquarters
Korea
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The jQuery Cookie JavaScript library is 393 times more popular than Namo WebEditor.
Total websites
Market share
Legacy
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
jQuery Cookie is more popular than Namo WebEditor in all countries.
United States
Japan
Russia
United Kingdom
Germany
Spain
Italy
France
Poland
Korea
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Russia in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Korea in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Belarus in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Kazakhstan in the Legacy category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Korea in the HTML Editors category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Germany in the HTML Editors category.
- ⬆️ 22nd most popular in Korea in the Legacy category.
- ⬆️ 60th most popular in Germany in the Legacy category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
jQuery Cookie is more popular than Namo WebEditor in all market segments.
Business
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Blogs/Wiki
Internet Services
Travel
Entertainment
Health
General News
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
UAParser.js🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.