🆚 jQuery vs. Slick
jQuery is much more popular than Slick.- jQuery is more popular in all countries.
Slick is particularly popular in Japan and India.
Type
About
jQuery is a fast, small, feature-rich 
JavaScript library designed to simplify 
HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, event handling, 
CSS animations, and Ajax.
It provides a cross-browser CSS selector engine, supports deferred and promise objects for asynchronous workflows, has built-in 
JSON parsing and utility functions, and can be extended through a large ecosystem of plugins.
Slick is an open-source jQuery carousel library for creating responsive, touch-enabled, and keyboard-accessible content sliders.
It offers more than 50 configuration options, responsive breakpoint-specific settings, infinite looping, lazy loading, variable-width and vertical layouts, synchronized sliders, and CSS3 transitions.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Sliders category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Sliders category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United Kingdom in the Sliders category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Germany in the Sliders category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
OpenJS Foundation company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,046,631 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.