🆚 Logly Audience Analytics vs. OnAudience
- 📈 Logly Audience Analytics is much more popular than OnAudience.
- 🌍 Logly Audience Analytics is more popular in Japan and Taiwan.
- 🌎 OnAudience is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and India.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Data management platform
Data management platform
About
Logly Audience Analytics, formerly known as Juicer, is a data management platform from Japan.
OnAudience empowers AdTech and MarTech ecosystems by providing privacy-safe mobile, desktop, and CTV data based on cookieless solutions.
Headquarters
Tokyo, Japan
London, United Kingdom
Pricing
Free version ✔️
¥50,000+/month
Free version ❌
$500+/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Logly Audience Analytics DMP is 12 times more popular than OnAudience.
Total websites
Market share
DMP
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Logly Audience Analytics is more popular in Japan and Taiwan, while OnAudience is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and India.
Japan
United States
United Kingdom
India
Russia
Poland
Spain
Germany
Australia
France
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Logly Audience Analytics is more popular among sites focused on business, education and reference, and fashion and beauty, while OnAudience is more commonly used on finance and banking sites.
Business
Education/Reference
Fashion/Beauty
Blogs/Wiki
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Health
Travel
Internet Services
Entertainment
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
