🆚 KakaoTalk vs. Line
Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *- 📈 Line is much more popular than KakaoTalk.
- 🌍 Line is more popular in Japan, Thailand, and Taiwan.
- 🌍 KakaoTalk is more popular in Korea and New Zealand.
Type
Messenger
Messenger
About
KakaoTalk is a Korean instant messenger for chats and real-time voice and video calls.
Line is a Japanese instant messaging and social networking app.
Headquarters
Jeju-si, Jeju-do, Korea
Tokyo, Japan
Pricing
Free ✔️
Free ✔️
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Line instant messaging app is 8 times more popular than KakaoTalk.
Total websites
Market share
Instant Messaging
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Line is more popular in Japan, Thailand, and Taiwan, while KakaoTalk is more popular in Korea and New Zealand.
Japan
Thailand
Korea
Taiwan
United States
Indonesia
Singapore
Canada
Cambodia
China
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Korea in the Instant Messaging category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Instant Messaging category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Taiwan in the Instant Messaging category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Taiwan in the Social Media category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Indonesia in the Instant Messaging category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Japan in the Social Media category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Line is more popular than KakaoTalk in all market segments.
Online Shopping
Business
Entertainment
Education/Reference
Blogs/Wiki
Travel
Marketing/Merchandising
Fashion/Beauty
Health
Internet Services
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Name
Rank
#742
#1,035
#2,487
#2,671
#12,953
Name
Rank
#436
#542
#543
#1,564
#2,162
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
Data updated
* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.
When interpreting and using the results, please read our methodology and disclaimer.