🆚 Lemon Squeezy vs. ProfilePress
- 📈 ProfilePress is much more popular than Lemon Squeezy.
- 🌍 ProfilePress is more popular in all countries.
Lemon Squeezy
ProfilePressType
About
Lemon Squeezy is an all-in-one platform for running SaaS and digital product businesses, now owned by 
Stripe, that provides payments, subscriptions, and merchant-of-record services.
It enables global sales by handling tax compliance, fraud prevention, and payments in over 130 currencies across 135+ countries, supports recurring and usage-based billing, license key management, and no-code or API-based checkout integration.
ProfilePress is a membership and e-commerce 
WordPress plugin that allows users to build paid membership sites and sell digital downloads and subscriptions. It integrates with various payment systems, such as Stripe, 
PayPal, and Razorpay, as well as LMS platforms including LearnDash, Sensei LMS, and Tutor LMS.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⬆️ 42nd most popular in the United States in the Email Marketing category.
- ⬆️ 51st most popular in the United States in the Payments category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Membership Management category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Membership Management category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Subscriptions category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the Membership Management category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Membership Management category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Paddle
FastSpring
PayPro Global
Cleverbridge
MemberPress
Payhip
Skool
Circle.so
Easy Digital Downloads
Proper Fraction LLC company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.