🆚 LiteSpeed Cache vs. Swift Performance
- 📈 LiteSpeed Cache is much more popular than Swift Performance.
- 🌍 LiteSpeed Cache is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Caching solution
Caching solution
About
LiteSpeed Cache is a server-side caching solution designed specifically for LiteSpeed web servers, available as a plugin for
WordPress,
Drupal,
Joomla,
Magento,
Shopware, etc.
Swift Performance is a WordPress caching plugin that includes page caching,
CSS and
JavaScript optimization, DB optimizer and plugin organizer.
Headquarters
Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, United States
Ujlengyel, Pest, Hungary
Pricing
Free ✔️ Requires LiteSpeed Web Server or QUIC.cloud CDN
Free version ✔️ Lite, open source
$49.99/year
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The LiteSpeed Cache caching solution is 429 times more popular than Swift Performance.
Total websites
Market share
Caching
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
LiteSpeed Cache is more popular than Swift Performance in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
Brazil
India
Spain
Australia
Netherlands
Poland
France
Canada
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United Kingdom in the Caching category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Brazil in the Caching category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in India in the Caching category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Spain in the Caching category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Australia in the Caching category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
LiteSpeed Cache is more popular than Swift Performance in all market segments.
Business
Blogs/Wiki
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Entertainment
Travel
General News
Health
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
LiteSpeed Cache
