🆚 Lucide vs. Material Symbols

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Icon library
Icon library

About

Lucide is an open-source icon library that provides over 1,600 SVG icons made by the community.

It supports tree-shaking to bundle only the icons in use, allows customization of color, size, and stroke width, and offers official packages for frameworks such as React, Vue, Svelte, Solid, and Angular.

Material Symbols is the icon set that contains over 3,000 glyphs designed by Google under the Material 3 design guidelines.

Headquarters

Mountain View, California, United States

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

Icons › Rank #10
Icons › Rank #12

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Lucide icon library is 1.4 times more popular than Material Symbols.
Total websites

Market share

Icons

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Lucide is more popular in the United States, India, and Brazil, while Material Symbols is more popular in Japan, Spain, and the Netherlands.
United States
Japan
India
Brazil
United Kingdom
France
Germany
Spain
Netherlands
Korea

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Lucide is more popular among sites focused on business, online shopping, and marketing and merchandising, while Material Symbols is more commonly used on education and reference, health, and sports sites.
Business
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Travel
Software/Hardware
Blogs/Wiki
Health
Entertainment

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#1,017
#1,156
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.