🆚 Marker.io vs. PageProofer
- 📈 Marker.io is much more popular than PageProofer.
- 🌎 Marker.io is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
- 🌍 PageProofer is more popular in Japan.
Type
About
Marker.io is a website feedback and annotation tool that lets teams capture visual feedback, screenshots and detailed issue reports directly from web pages.
It provides a lightweight feedback widget or browser extension for annotated screenshots, session replay, automatic capture of browser, OS, and console logs, and two-way integrations with project management tools such as 
Jira, Trello, 
Asana, ClickUp, and 
GitHub.
PageProofer is a visual annotation and website feedback tool that lets users leave notes, drawings, screenshots, and screen recordings pinned to specific web page elements to communicate design issues and bugs.
It captures contextual metadata such as browser, OS, and screen size, supports file attachments and comments, offers a centralized dashboard for tracking and assigning feedback, and integrates with project management tools like Trello, Jira, and 
Slack.
Headquarters
Pricing
(5 users)$39/month
(20 users)$89/month
(unlimited users)$199/month
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🔥 15th most popular in the Netherlands in the Feedback category.
- 🔥 18th most popular in Germany in the Feedback category.
- ⬆️ 22nd most popular in Australia in the Feedback category.
- ⬆️ 23rd most popular in Canada in the Feedback category.
- ⬆️ 25th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Feedback category.
- ⬆️ 49th most popular in the United States in the Feedback category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Userback
Jam🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.