🆚 Marker.io vs. Usersnap
- 📈 Marker.io is twice as popular as Usersnap.
- 🌎 Marker.io is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
- 🌍 Usersnap is more popular in France, Switzerland, and Austria.
Type
About
Marker.io is a website feedback and annotation tool that lets teams capture visual feedback, screenshots and detailed issue reports directly from web pages.
It provides a lightweight feedback widget or browser extension for annotated screenshots, session replay, automatic capture of browser, OS, and console logs, and two-way integrations with project management tools such as Jira, Trello,
Asana, ClickUp, and
GitHub.
Usersnap is a versatile user feedback platform for product teams to collect feedback and issues with screen capture tools, customer satisfaction micro-surveys, and upvotes on feature requests.
Headquarters
Pricing
(5 projects, 5 seats)€49/month
(15 projects, 10 seats)€109/month
(20 projects, 20 seats)€199/month
(50 projects, 50 seats)€389+/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🔥 15th most popular in the Netherlands in the Feedback category.
- 🔥 18th most popular in Germany in the Feedback category.
- ⬆️ 22nd most popular in Australia in the Feedback category.
- ⬆️ 23rd most popular in Canada in the Feedback category.
- ⬆️ 25th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Feedback category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Switzerland in the Customer Support category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in France in the Customer Support category.
- 🔥 16th most popular in the United States in the Customer Support category.
- 🔥 17th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Customer Support category.
- 🔥 18th most popular in Switzerland in the Feedback category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Frill