🆚 Material UI vs. Radix UI
- 📈 Radix UI is noticeably more popular than Material UI.
- 🌎 Radix UI is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
- 🌍 Material UI is more popular in France, India, and Indonesia.
Type
About
Material UI (MUI) is an open-source React component library that implements Google's
Material Design.
It offers a comprehensive suite of prebuilt components, such as buttons, cards, modals, charts, data grid, tree view, along with built-in themes, typography, and full responsiveness and accessibility.
Radix UI is an open-source component library that provides low-level, unstyled interface primitives for building accessible user interfaces and design systems in web applications.
It includes modular components for common UI patterns such as dialogs, dropdown menus, tooltips, sliders, tabs, and checkboxes, and implements ARIA accessibility patterns with keyboard navigation and focus management.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Indonesia in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Israel in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Norway in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in the United States in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in France in the UI Frameworks category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Norway in the Components category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Indonesia in the Components category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Denmark in the Components category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Vietnam in the Components category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Sweden in the Components category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.

