🆚 Material UI vs. Tailwind CSS

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

User interface framework
User interface framework

About

Material UI (MUI) is an open-source React component library that implements Google's Material Design.

It offers a comprehensive suite of prebuilt components, such as buttons, cards, modals, charts, data grid, tree view, along with built-in themes, typography, and full responsiveness and accessibility.

Tailwind CSS is an open-source utility-first framework that provides low-level CSS classes for building user interfaces directly in markup.

It includes hundreds of utility classes, supports responsive design and dark mode, enables tree-shaking to remove unused styles for optimized builds, and offers 500+ UI blocks, 10+ templates, and the Catalyst UI kit via paid Tailwind Plus, formerly known as Tailwind UI.

Headquarters

Paris, France
Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

Website

Pricing

Free version ✔️Community version, 40+ free components, open source
Pro$180/developer/year
Premium$588/developer/year
Free version ✔️Open source
UI Blocks
Marketing$149
Application UI$149
Ecommerce$149
Tailwind Plus
Personal$299
Teams$979

Categories

UI Frameworks › Rank #10
UI Frameworks › Rank #3

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Tailwind CSS UI framework is 21 times more popular than Material UI.
Total websites

Market share

UI Frameworks

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Tailwind CSS is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany, while Material UI is more popular in DPR Korea.
United States
United Kingdom
Germany
France
Netherlands
India
Australia
Brazil
Canada
Italy

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Tailwind CSS is more popular than Material UI in all market segments.
Business
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Blogs/Wiki
Entertainment
Travel
Software/Hardware
Health

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#317
View more ➝
Name
Rank
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.