🆚 Materialize vs. PrimeFaces
- 📈 Materialize is much more popular than PrimeFaces.
- 🌎 Materialize is more popular in the United States, Germany, and France.
- 🌍 PrimeFaces is more popular in Cameroon.
Statistics based on 3.6M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
User interface framework
User interface framework
About
Materialize is a responsive CSS framework based on Google's
Material Design guidelines.
It includes a responsive grid system, badges, buttons, cards, modals, parallax effects, and other CSS and JavaScript components.
PrimeFaces is an open-source JavaServer Faces framework with over 100 components, a touch-optimized mobile kit, client-side validation, and a theme engine.
Headquarters
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Ankara, Turkey
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free version ✔️ Open source
LTS Basic $249
LTS Extended $990
Pro support $200/hour
Categories
UI Frameworks › Rank #8
UI Frameworks › Rank #34
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Materialize UI framework is 21 times more popular than PrimeFaces.
Total websites
Market share
UI Frameworks
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Materialize is more popular in the United States, Germany, and France, while PrimeFaces is more popular in Cameroon.
United States
Germany
France
Iran
India
Brazil
United Kingdom
Italy
Russia
Spain
Awards
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Iran in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in India in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Turkey in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Switzerland in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Indonesia in the UI Frameworks category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Materialize is more popular than PrimeFaces in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Entertainment
Internet Services
Online Shopping
General News
Blogs/Wiki
Health
Sports
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,604,716 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
MDB
Material Design Lite
Foundation