🆚 Memcached vs. Microsoft SQL Server
- 📈 Memcached is much more popular than Microsoft SQL Server.
- 🌎 Memcached is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia.
- 🌍 Microsoft SQL Server is more popular in the Czech Republic, Russia, and Iran.
Type
About
Memcached is an open-source event-based key-value store that keeps data in memory to deliver very low latency access and high throughput.
It can handle over 200,000 operations per second on fast hardware, uses multi-threading to leverage multiple CPU cores, and applies Least Recently Used cache eviction policy when it runs out of memory.
Microsoft SQL Server is a relational database management system developed by Microsoft.
It supports Transact-SQL (T-SQL) as its query language, runs on both Windows and
Linux platforms, includes features such as Always On Availability Groups, in-memory OLTP, Transparent Data Encryption, and row-level security.
Headquarters
Pricing
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Databases category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Australia in the Databases category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Canada in the Databases category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in New Zealand in the Databases category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Mexico in the Databases category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the Czech Republic in the Databases category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Iran in the Databases category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in the United States in the Databases category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in the United Kingdom in the Databases category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Australia in the Databases category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.


RocksDB
Tarantool