🆚 Amazon DynamoDB vs. Memcached
- 📈 Memcached is much more popular than Amazon DynamoDB.
- 🌍 Memcached is more popular in all countries.
Type
About
Amazon DynamoDB is a serverless, fully managed NoSQL database service that supports key-value and document data models for applications requiring predictable low-latency performance at any scale.
It provides automatic scaling, single-digit millisecond response times, global tables for multi-region replication, secondary indexes, ACID transactions, and in-memory acceleration through DynamoDB Accelerator.
Memcached is an open-source event-based key-value store that keeps data in memory to deliver very low latency access and high throughput.
It can handle over 200,000 operations per second on fast hardware, uses multi-threading to leverage multiple CPU cores, and applies Least Recently Used cache eviction policy when it runs out of memory.
Headquarters
Pricing
(1 unit for each write/2 units for transactional write) $0.625/million
(1 unit for each strongly consistent read/2 units for transactional read) $0.125/million
(1 unit for each write per second/2 units for each transactional write per second) $0.00065
(1 unit for each strongly consistent read per second, 2 units for transactional read per second) $0.00013
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Databases category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Australia in the Databases category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Canada in the Databases category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Japan in the Databases category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in New Zealand in the Databases category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,603,958 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.


RocksDB
Tarantool
Amazon company profile