🆚 Amazon DynamoDB vs. Bigtable
- 📈 Amazon DynamoDB is noticeably more popular than Bigtable.
- 🌎 Amazon DynamoDB is more popular in the United States, Chile, and Uruguay.
- 🌍 Bigtable is more popular in Germany, Italy, and France.
Amazon DynamoDB
BigtableType
About
Amazon DynamoDB is a serverless, fully managed NoSQL database service that supports key-value and document data models for applications requiring predictable low-latency performance at any scale.
It provides automatic scaling, single-digit millisecond response times, global tables for multi-region replication, secondary indexes, ACID transactions, and in-memory acceleration through DynamoDB Accelerator.
Bigtable is a distributed NoSQL key-value and wide-column database designed for low-latency, high-throughput workloads at large scale.
It stores data in sparsely populated tables with automatic sharding and replication, supports single-digit millisecond latency, SSD and HDD storage tiers, continuous backups, and SQL queries through BigQuery integration.
Headquarters
aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/Pricing
(1 unit for each write/2 units for transactional write) $0.625/million
(1 unit for each strongly consistent read/2 units for transactional read) $0.125/million
(1 unit for each write per second/2 units for each transactional write per second) $0.00065
(1 unit for each strongly consistent read per second, 2 units for transactional read per second) $0.00013
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🔥 12nd most popular in the United States in the Databases category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in the United States in the Databases category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Amazon company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.