🆚 Amazon DynamoDB vs. Couchbase
- 📈 Couchbase is much more popular than Amazon DynamoDB.
- 🌎 Couchbase is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Korea.
- 🌍 Amazon DynamoDB is more popular in Argentina, Japan, and Chile.
Amazon DynamoDB
CouchbaseType
About
Amazon DynamoDB is a serverless, fully managed NoSQL database service that supports key-value and document data models for applications requiring predictable low-latency performance at any scale.
It provides automatic scaling, single-digit millisecond response times, global tables for multi-region replication, secondary indexes, ACID transactions, and in-memory acceleration through DynamoDB Accelerator.
Couchbase is a distributed NoSQL database that was created in 2011 as a fork of 
CouchDB and designed for high-performance, scalable applications using 
JSON data.
It combines a document store with key-value access, supports SQL++ queries with joins and ACID transactions, includes built-in services for full-text search, analytics, and event processing, and uses a memory-first architecture with managed caching, clustering, and cross data center replication for low-latency operations and high availability.
Headquarters
aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/Pricing
(1 unit for each write/2 units for transactional write) $0.625/million
(1 unit for each strongly consistent read/2 units for transactional read) $0.125/million
(1 unit for each write per second/2 units for each transactional write per second) $0.00065
(1 unit for each strongly consistent read per second, 2 units for transactional read per second) $0.00013
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Amazon company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,717,657 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.