🆚 MIP vs. Ress
- 📈 Ress is much more popular than MIP.
- 🌎 Ress is more popular in Japan, the United States, and Germany.
- 🌍 MIP is more popular in China, Hong Kong, and Macao.
Statistics based on 3.5M+ analyzed websites. About this data
MIPType
Website component
Website component
About
MIP (Mobile Instant Pages) is an open mobile-page framework created by Baidu as an alternative to Google's AMP for delivering fast-loading pages on mobile devices.
It uses a restricted MIP-HTML markup and a controlled 
JavaScript runtime, applies CDN caching and optimized resource loading.
A modern 
CSS reset based on Normalize.css.
Headquarters
Beijing, China
Brazil
GitHubPricing
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Ress component technology is 9 times more popular than MIP.
Total websites
Market share
Components
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Ress is more popular in Japan, the United States, and Germany, while MIP is more popular in China, Hong Kong, and Macao.
Japan
China
United States
Germany
France
Russia
Brazil
Iran
Ecuador
United Kingdom
Awards
- 🥉 Third most popular in China in the Components category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in China in the UI Frameworks category.
- 🔥 15th most popular in China in the Legacy category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Japan in the Components category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Iran in the Components category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Russia in the Components category.
- 🔥 12nd most popular in Brazil in the Components category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Ress is more popular than MIP in all market segments.
Business
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Games
Travel
Blogs/Wiki
Entertainment
Internet Services
Software/Hardware
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Normalize.css
Hover.css
Baidu company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,512,920 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.