🆚 mod_apreq2 vs. mod_auth_pam
- 📈 mod_apreq2 is three times more popular than mod_auth_pam.
- 🌍 mod_apreq2 is more popular in Russia, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌎 mod_auth_pam is more popular in the United States and Costa Rica.
Statistics based on 3.5M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Web server module
Web server module
About
mod_apreq2 is an Apache HTTP Server filter module that connects the libapreq2 request parsing library into the server.
It provides the APREQ2 input filter so parsed HTTP cookies, query strings, and POST data from the libapreq2 library are available in every request phase.
Headquarters
Wilmington, Delaware, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Web Server Modules › Rank #15
Web Server Modules › Rank #21
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The mod_apreq2 web server module is 3 times more popular than mod_auth_pam.
Total websites
Market share
Web Server Modules
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
mod_apreq2 is more popular in Russia, Sweden, and the United Kingdom, while mod_auth_pam is more popular in the United States and Costa Rica.
United States
Russia
Sweden
United Kingdom
France
Japan
Hungary
Canada
Denmark
Indonesia
Awards
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Russia in the Web Server Modules category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in the United States in the Web Server Modules category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
mod_apreq2 is more popular among sites focused on education and reference, business, and marketing and merchandising, while mod_auth_pam is more commonly used on personal pages and software and hardware sites.
Education/Reference
Business
Personal Pages
Marketing/Merchandising
Internet Services
Online Shopping
Entertainment
Software/Hardware
Travel
Recreation/Hobbies
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,511,216 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
mod_apreq2