🆚 MooTools vs. Slick
- 📈 Slick is much more popular than MooTools.
- 🌎 Slick is more popular in the United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 MooTools is more popular in Guinea-Bissau.
MooTools
SlickType
About
MooTools is an open-source 
JavaScript library that simplifies DOM manipulation, event handling, AJAX, animations, and object-oriented application development.
It extends native JavaScript and DOM objects with additional methods, and provides built-in effects and transitions, 
CSS selector support, and utilities for cookies and 
JSON.
Slick is an open-source 
jQuery carousel library for creating responsive, touch-enabled, and keyboard-accessible content sliders.
It offers more than 50 configuration options, responsive breakpoint-specific settings, infinite looping, lazy loading, variable-width and vertical layouts, synchronized sliders, and CSS3 transitions.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⬆️ 31st most popular in Russia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 31st most popular in Belarus in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 32nd most popular in Kazakhstan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 35th most popular in Ukraine in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 35th most popular in Greece in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the U.S. Virgin Islands in the Sliders category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Sliders category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United Kingdom in the Sliders category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,823,966 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.