🆚 MooTools vs. Swiper
- 📈 Swiper is much more popular than MooTools.
- 🌍 Swiper is more popular in all countries.
MooTools
SwiperType
About
MooTools is an open-source 
JavaScript library that simplifies DOM manipulation, event handling, AJAX, animations, and object-oriented application development.
It extends native JavaScript and DOM objects with additional methods, and provides built-in effects and transitions, 
CSS selector support, and utilities for cookies and 
JSON.
Swiper is a modern touch slider library for building responsive sliders and carousels with hardware-accelerated transitions.
It offers touch and swipe navigation optimized for mobile, native-like momentum and resistance effects, support for vertical and horizontal modes, a modular plugin system with pagination, navigation, thumbnails, and parallax, accessibility features, and integrations with popular frameworks such as 
React, 
Vue, and 
Angular.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⬆️ 29th most popular in Belarus in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 30th most popular in Russia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 32nd most popular in Kazakhstan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 34th most popular in Ukraine in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 36th most popular in Greece in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in China in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the Sliders category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Nolimits4web company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,629,123 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.