🆚 Morphext vs. Scriptaculous
- 📈 Morphext is as popular as Scriptaculous.
- 🌎 Morphext is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and France.
- 🌍 Scriptaculous is more popular in Germany, Japan, and Italy.
Morphext
ScriptaculousType
About
Morphext is a cross-browser 
jQuery plugin that rotates text phrases in a carousel using 
CSS3 animations powered by Animate.css.
It supports customizable entry animations, configurable phrase separators and rotation delay, and a callback after each animation.
Script.aculo.us is an open-source 
JavaScript library built on the Prototype framework that provides visual effects, user interface controls, and AJAX utilities for web applications.
It includes a core set of five combinable effects for opacity, scaling, movement, highlighting, and parallel execution, supports drag-and-drop and sortable lists, provides autocompletion and in-place editing controls, and offers DOM utilities and a unit testing framework.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Indonesia in the Animation category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in the United States in the Animation category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Poland in the Animation category.
- 🔥 12nd most popular in France in the Animation category.
- 🔥 12nd most popular in Spain in the Animation category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in the Czech Republic in the Animation category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Germany in the Animation category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Poland in the Animation category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Hungary in the Animation category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Romania in the Animation category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.