🆚 Morphext vs. TinyMCE
TinyMCE is four times more popular than Morphext.
TinyMCE is more popular in the United States, Germany, and France.
Morphext is more popular in Mauritius, Laos, and Belize.
Type
About
Morphext is a cross-browser jQuery plugin that rotates text phrases in a carousel using
CSS3 animations powered by
Animate.css.
It supports customizable entry animations, configurable phrase separators and rotation delay, and a callback after each animation.
TinyMCE is a JavaScript-based WYSIWYG rich text editor that transforms
HTML textarea or designated elements into a full editing interface for web applications.
It provides core rich text editing, clean paste from Word and Google Docs, enhanced media embedding and optimization, real-time collaboration with comments and revision history, document import/export and
Markdown support via a paid plugin, productivity tools such as templates and math equations, and integrations with 10+ frameworks such as
React,
Angular,
Vue, and
Svelte.
Headquarters
Pricing
(5K editor loads) $92/month
(20K editor loads) $170/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Indonesia in the Animation category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Argentina in the Animation category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in the United States in the Animation category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Poland in the Animation category.
- 🔥 12nd most popular in France in the Animation category.
- ⬆️ 40th most popular in Slovenia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 47th most popular in Saudi Arabia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 49th most popular in France in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 52nd most popular in Norway in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 54th most popular in Canada in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,046,631 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.





