🆚 Morphext vs. TinyMCE
- 📈 TinyMCE is four times more popular than Morphext.
- 🌎 TinyMCE is more popular in the United States, Germany, and France.
- 🌍 Morphext is more popular in Peru, Lebanon, and Laos.
TinyMCEType
About
A simple, high-performance and cross-browser 
jQuery rotating / carousel plugin for text phrases powered by Animate.css.
TinyMCE is a 
JavaScript-based WYSIWYG rich text editor that transforms 
HTML textarea or designated elements into a full editing interface for web applications.
It provides core rich text editing, clean paste from Word and 
Google Docs, enhanced media embedding and optimization, real-time collaboration with comments and revision history, document import/export and 
Markdown support via a paid plugin, productivity tools such as templates and math equations, and integrations with 12+ frameworks such as 
React, 
Angular, 
Vue, and 
Svelte.
Headquarters
Pricing
(5K editor loads)$92/month
(20K editor loads)$170/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Chile in the Animation category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Argentina in the Animation category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in South Africa in the Animation category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Malaysia in the Animation category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Singapore in the Animation category.
- ⬆️ 43rd most popular in Slovenia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 47th most popular in Saudi Arabia in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 53rd most popular in Norway in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 55th most popular in France in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 57th most popular in Thailand in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Animsition
CKEditor
Froala
Quill🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,431,368 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.