🆚 MudBlazor vs. Spectre.css
- 📈 Spectre.css is much more popular than MudBlazor.
- 🌍 Spectre.css is more popular in all countries.
MudBlazor
Spectre.cssType
About
MudBlazor is an open-source 
Blazor component library based on 
Material Design principles that provides developers with reusable UI elements for building modern web applications in 
C#.
It includes a comprehensive set of responsive components such as tables, dialogs, forms, navigation elements, and grids, supports both Blazor Server and 
WebAssembly, and offers built-in theming and customization with minimal 
JavaScript dependency.
Spectre.css is a lightweight, responsive 
CSS framework designed for faster and extensible development.
It provides basic styles for typography, utility classes for spacing and alignment, a flexbox-based 12-column grid system, pure CSS components like menus, modals and tooltips, and supports customization via 
Sass.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⬆️ 36th most popular in the United States in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Armenia in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Ukraine in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Portugal in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Bulgaria in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Slovakia in the UI Frameworks category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Bootstrap
Tailwind CSS
Radzen Blazor
BlazorBootstrap
Foundation
Bulma🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.