🆚 MudBlazor vs. Vuetify
- 📈 Vuetify is much more popular than MudBlazor.
- 🌎 Vuetify is more popular in the United States, Germany, and Japan.
- 🌍 MudBlazor is more popular in Denmark, Seychelles, and Egypt.
MudBlazor
VuetifyType
About
MudBlazor is an open-source 
Blazor component library based on 
Material Design principles that provides developers with reusable UI elements for building modern web applications in 
C#.
It includes a comprehensive set of responsive components such as tables, dialogs, forms, navigation elements, and grids, supports both Blazor Server and 
WebAssembly, and offers built-in theming and customization with minimal 
JavaScript dependency.
Vuetify is an open-source Vue component framework that provides over 100 pre-built components implementing Google's Material Design specification.
It provides an outside-in application layout system, 
CSS layers that avoid specificity conflicts with utility frameworks such as 
Tailwind CSS, Material Design 3 typography and elevation, unstyled foundations for headless components, a CLI for project scaffolding, and an official 
Figma UI kit with over 500 components.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🔥 13rd most popular in Japan in the UI Frameworks category.
- 🔥 17th most popular in Russia in the UI Frameworks category.
- 🔥 20th most popular in France in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⬆️ 22nd most popular in Germany in the UI Frameworks category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,001,723 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.