🆚 Orchard Core vs. Storyblok
- 📈 Storyblok is much more popular than Orchard Core.
- 🌎 Storyblok is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Orchard Core is more popular in South Africa, Vietnam, and Serbia.
StoryblokType
About
Orchard Core is an open-source, modular content management system and application framework built on 
ASP.NET Core that allows multiple sites to run from a single installation and supports both traditional and headless content delivery.
It provides a plug-in architecture with customizable content types, site isolation within one instance, built-in REST and 
GraphQL APIs, media and multilingual management, and Liquid templating.
Storyblok is an enterprise-grade headless content management system with a visual editor.
It provides a component-based content model, drag-and-drop live preview editing for non-technical users, built-in localization, versioning and audit trails, global caching via 
CloudFront CDN, and GraphQL and REST APIs.
Headquarters
Pricing
(5 users)$99/month
(15 users)$349/month
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⬆️ 40th most popular in the United Kingdom in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 103rd most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Sweden in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in the Netherlands in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Austria in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Ireland in the CMS category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in Germany in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Optimizely CMS
Strapi
Contentstack
CoreMedia
Sanity
Prismic🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.