🆚 Orchard Core vs. Strapi
- 📈 Strapi is much more popular than Orchard Core.
- 🌎 Strapi is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Orchard Core is more popular in Oman.
StrapiType
About
Orchard Core is an open-source, modular content management system and application framework built on 
ASP.NET Core that allows multiple sites to run from a single installation and supports both traditional and headless content delivery.
It provides a plug-in architecture with customizable content types, site isolation within one instance, built-in REST and 
GraphQL APIs, media and multilingual management, and Liquid templating.
Strapi is an open-source headless CMS built with 
Node.js and 
TypeScript that connects to various databases and frontend frameworks.
It lets teams define custom content types and schemas, supports REST and GraphQL APIs, provides role-based access control, a media library, internationalization, plugin extensibility, and a fully customizable admin panel.
Headquarters
Pricing
(50K API, 50 GB)$18/month
(1M API, 250 GB)$90/month
(10M API, 1,000 GB)$450/month
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⬆️ 40th most popular in the United Kingdom in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 103rd most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in India in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Brazil in the CMS category.
- 🔥 13rd most popular in France in the CMS category.
- 🔥 13rd most popular in the Czech Republic in the CMS category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in Russia in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Optimizely CMS
Storyblok
Contentstack
CoreMedia
Sanity
Prismic🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.