🆚 Paddle vs. ProfilePress
ProfilePress is much more popular than Paddle.- ProfilePress is more popular in the United States, Japan, and Germany.
Paddle is more popular in Bangladesh.
Type
About
Paddle is a software-as-a-service commerce platform that provides payments, tax compliance and subscription infrastructure for software companies.
It acts as the merchant of record, handling global sales tax collection and remittance across 200+ markets, supports hosted and inline checkouts, one-time and recurring billing, offers developer APIs and webhooks for subscription lifecycle events, and provides reporting on MRR, churn, and ARR.
ProfilePress is a membership and e-commerce 
WordPress plugin that allows users to build paid membership sites and sell digital downloads and subscriptions. It integrates with various payment systems, such as 
Stripe, 
PayPal, and Razorpay, as well as LMS platforms including LearnDash, Sensei LMS, and Tutor LMS.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Germany in the Subscriptions category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in the United States in the Subscriptions category.
- ⬆️ 25th most popular in the United States in the Online Payments category.
- ⬆️ 29th most popular in Germany in the Online Payments category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Membership Management category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Membership Management category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Subscriptions category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Italy in the Membership Management category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the Membership Management category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Proper Fraction LLC company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,046,631 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.