🆚 Pentaho vs. Tinybird
- 📈 Tinybird is much more popular than Pentaho.
- 🌍 Tinybird is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Pentaho is particularly popular in Brazil.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Pentaho
TinybirdType
Business intelligence software
Business intelligence software
About
Pentaho is a 
Java-based BI solution, available in open-source and commercial editions.
Tinybird is a managed, serverless, real-time analytics backend service built on ClickHouse that helps developers collect, process, and share data through APIs.
It allows fast querying of large datasets, streams data from multiple sources, automatically creates secure API endpoints, and offers 
Git/CI-friendly workflows.
Headquarters
Santa Clara, California, United States
New York, United States
Pricing
Free version ✔️ 1,000 queries per day, 10GB storage
Developer $25+/month
Enterprise Custom
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Tinybird tool is 293 times more popular than Pentaho.
Total websites
Market share
BI
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Tinybird is more popular than Pentaho in all countries.
United States
Brazil
United Kingdom
Germany
Sweden
Israel
France
Spain
Australia
India
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the BI category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Brazil in the BI category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the BI category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the BI category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Sweden in the BI category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Tinybird is more popular than Pentaho in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Internet Services
Online Shopping
Motor Vehicles
Blogs/Wiki
Education/Reference
Entertainment
Travel
Health
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,816,780 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.