🆚 Phusion Passenger vs. Thin
Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *- 📈 Phusion Passenger is much more popular than Thin.
- 🌍 Phusion Passenger is more popular in all countries.
Type
Web server
Web server
About
Phusion Passenger a fast and robust web server and application server for Ruby, Python and Node.js.
Thin is a fast and simple Ruby web server.
Headquarters
Apeldoorn, Netherlands
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Pricing
Free version ✔️Open source
Passenger Enterprise$43.32+/month
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
Web Servers › Rank #12
Web Servers › Rank #35
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Phusion Passenger web server is 127 times more popular than Thin.
Total websites
Market share
Web Servers
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Phusion Passenger is more popular than Thin in all countries.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
Canada
Japan
France
Spain
Russia
Poland
Netherlands
Awards
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Ukraine in the Web Servers category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Croatia in the Web Servers category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Poland in the Web Servers category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in the Czech Republic in the Web Servers category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Mexico in the Web Servers category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Phusion Passenger is more popular than Thin in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Online Shopping
Internet Services
Entertainment
Sports
Travel
Blogs/Wiki
Real Estate
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Tomcat
Oracle WebLogic Server
GlassFish
Nginx
Apache
OpenResty
WEBrick* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.