🆚 Plyr vs. YouTube Player
- 📈 YouTube Player is much more popular than Plyr.
- 🌎 YouTube Player is more popular in the United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Plyr is more popular in Iran and the Solomon Islands.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Video player
Video player
About
The embedded Youtube video player.
Headquarters
Sydney, Australia
Mountain View, California, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The YouTube video player is 11 times more popular than Plyr.
Total websites
Market share
Video Players
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
YouTube Player is more popular in the United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom, while Plyr is more popular in Iran and the Solomon Islands.
United States
Japan
United Kingdom
Germany
India
France
Spain
Australia
Brazil
Italy
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Iran in the Video Players category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Indonesia in the Video Players category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Saudi Arabia in the Video Players category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Nigeria in the Video Players category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Bangladesh in the Video Players category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Video Players category.
- 🥇 Most popular in India in the Video Players category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Brazil in the Video Players category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Vietnam in the Video Players category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Russia in the Video Players category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
YouTube Player is more popular than Plyr in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Online Shopping
Blogs/Wiki
Entertainment
Travel
Health
Internet Services
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.