🆚 PouchDB vs. Redis
- 📈 Redis is much more popular than PouchDB.
- 🌍 Redis is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ PouchDB is particularly popular in New Zealand.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
RedisType
Database
Database
About
PouchDB is an open-source 
JavaScript database inspired by Apache CouchDB that is designed to run well within the browser.
Redis is a popular high-performance in-memory key-value database that persists on disk.
It supports rich data structures beyond simple strings, offers master-replica replication, clustering across up to thousands of nodes via hash-slot sharding, and automatic failover.
Headquarters
San Francisco, California, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free version ✔️ Open source
Cloud Essentials $5+/month
Cloud Pro $0.881/hour
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Redis database is 3,402 times more popular than PouchDB.
Total websites
Market share
Databases
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Redis is more popular than PouchDB in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
Australia
Canada
Germany
India
France
Japan
Netherlands
Italy
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United Kingdom in the Databases category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Australia in the Databases category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Canada in the Databases category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Germany in the Databases category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in India in the Databases category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Redis is more popular than PouchDB in all market segments.
Online Shopping
Marketing/Merchandising
Fashion/Beauty
Business
Blogs/Wiki
Sports
Entertainment
Health
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.