🆚 Prototype vs. Slick
- 📈 Slick is much more popular than Prototype.
- 🌍 Slick is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Prototype is particularly popular in Germany.
SlickType
About
Prototype is a legacy open-source 
JavaScript framework that eases cross-browser development of dynamic web applications.
It offers Ajax helpers for asynchronous requests, DOM extensions including element selection shortcuts and a 
CSS selector engine, class-based inheritance, an Enumerable module for array iteration, form field access methods, and a template formatting class.
Slick is an open-source 
jQuery carousel library for creating responsive, touch-enabled, and keyboard-accessible content sliders.
It offers more than 50 configuration options, responsive breakpoint-specific settings, infinite looping, lazy loading, variable-width and vertical layouts, synchronized sliders, and CSS3 transitions.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⬆️ 50th most popular in Lithuania in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 59th most popular in Finland in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 61st most popular in Germany in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 61st most popular in the Czech Republic in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 63rd most popular in the Netherlands in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the U.S. Virgin Islands in the Sliders category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Sliders category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United Kingdom in the Sliders category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,823,966 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.